This commit is contained in:
2025-08-29 15:28:30 +02:00
parent 83b8df17fe
commit 591ea99899
143 changed files with 7773 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Automatically inlining functions is not easy</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link rel="icon" sizes="512x512" href="res/favicon.png">
<link rel="image_src" type="image/png" href="res/favicon.png">
<link type="application/atom+xml" rel="alternate" title="alexs168's blog" href="atom.xml">
</head>
<body>
<style>
@font-face {
font-family: 'DejaVu Sans Mono';
src:local('DejaVu Sans Mono'),
url('res/DejaVuSansMono.woff2') format('woff2'),
local('Courier New'),
local(Courier),
local(monospace);
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
font-display: swap;
}
/*
@font-face {
font-family: 'DejaVu Sans Mono';
src:local('DejaVu Sans Mono'),
url('res/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.woff2') format('woff2'),
local('Courier New'),
local(Courier),
local(monospace);
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
font-display: swap;
}
@font-face {
font-family: 'DejaVu Sans';
src:local('DejaVu Sans'),
url('res/DejaVuSans-Bold.woff2') format('woff2'),
local('Courier New');
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
font-display: swap;
}
@font-face {
font-family: 'DejaVu Sans';
src:local('DejaVu Sans'),
url('res/DejaVuSans.woff2') format('woff2'),
local('Courier New');
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
font-display: swap;
}*/
body {
font-family: DejaVu Sans Mono;
font-size: 10pt;
}
td {
width: 100%;
display: inline;
vertical-align: top;
}
h1,h2,h3,h4 {
margin-top: 1%;
margin-bottom: 0.75%;
}
p {
margin-top: 0.75%;
margin-bottom: 0.75%;
}
ul {
margin-top: 0%;
}
.current {
font-weight: bold;
}
pre {
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
display: inline;
}
a {
color: #3f51b5;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:visited {
color: #3f51b5;
text-decoration: none;
}
</style>
<div style="
">
<p><br></p>
<h1>Automatically inlining functions is not easy</h1>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt"><p>Git revision <a href="https://github.com/alex-s168/website/tree/9c2913af189b62c028f6f773370f50f9e6c13307">#9c2913af</a></p><p><br>Modified at 11. August 2025 16:38</p><p>Written by <a href="https://alex.vxcc.dev">alex_s168</a></p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="
"><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h2>Introduction</h2></span> Function calls have some overhead, which can sometimes be a big issue for other optimizations. Because of that, compiler backends (should) inline function calls. There are however many issues with just greedily inlining calls…</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h2>Greedy inlining with heuristics</h2></span> This is the most obvious approach. We can just inline all functions with only one call, and then inline calls where the inlined function does not have many instructions.</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<div class style="margin-top:4pt;"><span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><pre><code>function f32 $square(f32 %x) {<br>@entry:<br> // this is stupid, but I couldn't come up with a better example<br> f32 %e = add %x, 0<br> f32 %out = add %e, %x<br> ret %out<br>}<br><br>function f32 $hypot(f32 %a, f32 %b) {<br>@entry:<br> f32 %as = call $square(%a)<br> f32 %bs = call $square(%b)<br> f32 %sum = add %as, %bs<br> f32 %o = sqrt %sum<br> ret %o<br>}<br><br>function f32 $tri_hypot({f32, f32} %x) {<br> f32 %a = extract %x, 0<br> f32 %b = extract %x, 1<br> f32 %o = call $hypot(%a, %b) // this is a "tail call"<br> ret %o<br>}<br><br>// let's assume that $hypot is used someplace else in the code too</code></pre></span></div>
</div>
<div style="
"><br>Lets assume our inlining treshold is 5 operations. Then we would get Waait there are multiple options…</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Issue 1: (sometimes) multiple options</h3></span> If we inline the <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$square</code></span> calls, then <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$hypot</code></span> will have too many instructions to be inlined into <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$tri_hypot</code></span>:</p>
<div class style="margin-top:4pt;"><span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><pre><code>...<br>function f32 $hypot(f32 %a, f32 %b) {<br>@entry:<br> // more instructions than our inlining treshold:<br> f32 %ase = add %a, 0<br> f32 %as = add %ase, %a<br> f32 %bse = add %b, 0<br> f32 %bs = add %bse, %b<br> f32 %sum = add %as, %bs<br> f32 %o = sqrt %sum<br> ret %o<br>}<br>...</code></pre></span></div>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br>The second option is to inline the <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$hypot</code></span> call into <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$tri_hypot</code></span>. (There are also some other options)</p>
<p>Now in this case, it seems obvious to prefer inlining <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$square</code></span> into <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$hypot</code></span>.</p>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Issue 2: ABI requirements on argument passing</h3></span> If we assume the target ABI only has one f32 register for passing arguments, then we would have to generate additional instructions for passing the second argument of <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$hypot</code></span>, and then it might actually be more efficient to inline <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$hypot</code></span> instead of <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$square</code></span>.</p>
<p>This example is not realistic, but this issue actually occurs when compiling lots of code.</p>
<p>Another related issue is that having more arguments arranged in a fixed way will require lots of moving data arround at the call site.</p>
<p>A solution to this is to make the heuristics not just output code size, but also make it depend on the number of arguments / outputs passed to the function.</p>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Issue 3: (sometimes) prevents optimizations</h3></span></p>
<div class style="margin-top:4pt;"><span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><pre><code>function f32 $myfunc(f32 %a, f32 %b) {<br>@entry:<br> f32 %sum = add %a, %b<br> f32 %sq = sqrt %sum<br> ...<br>}<br><br>function $callsite(f32 %a, f32 %b) {<br>@entry:<br> f32 %as = add %a, %a<br> f32 %bs = add %b, %b<br> f32 %x = call $myfunc(%as, %bs)<br> ...<br>}</code></pre></span></div>
<p>If the target has a efficient <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">hypot</code></span> operation, then that operation will only be used if we inline <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$myfunc</code></span> into <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$callsite</code></span>.</p>
<p>This means that inlining is now depended on… instruction selection??</p>
<p>This is not the only optimization prevented by not inlining the call. If <span style="
border:1pt solid black;
border-radius:2pt;
padding:1.6pt;display:inline-block"><code style="white-space: pre-wrap">$callsite</code></span> were to be called in a loop, then not inlining would prevent vectorization.</p>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h2>Function outlining</h2></span> A related optimization is “outlining”. Its the opposite to inlining. It moves duplicate code into a function, to reduce code size, and sometimes increase performance (because of instruction caching)</p>
<p>If we do inlining seperately from outlining, we often get unoptimal code.</p>
</div>
<div style="
"><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h2>A better approach</h2></span> We can instead first inline <strong>all</strong> inlinable calls, and <strong>then</strong> perform more agressive outlining.</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Step 1: inlining</h3></span> We inline <strong>all</strong> function calls, except for:</p>
<ul>
<li>self recursion (obviously)</li>
<li>functions explicitly marked as no-inline by the user</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Step 2: detect duplicate code</h3></span> There are many algorithms for doing this.</p>
<p>The goal of this step is to both:</p>
<ul>
<li>maximize size of outlinable section</li>
<li>minimize size of code</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Step 3: slightly reduce size of outlinable section</h3></span> The goal is to reduce size of outlinable sections, to make the code more optimal.</p>
<p>This should be ABI and instruction depended, and have the goal of:</p>
<ul>
<li>reducing argument shuffles required at all call sites</li>
<li>reducing register preassure</li>
<li>not preventing good isel choices and optimizations.</li>
</ul>
<p>this is also dependent on the targetted code size.</p>
</div>
<div style="
"><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Step 4: perform outlining</h3></span> This is obvious.</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h3>Issue 1: high compile-time memory usage</h3></span> Inlining <strong>all</strong> function calls first will increase the memory usage during compilation by A LOT</p>
<p>Im sure that there is a smarter way to implement this method, without actually performing the inlining…</p>
</div>
<div style="
">
<p><br><span style="text-decoration: underline"><h2>Conclusion</h2></span> Function inlining is much more complex than one might think.</p>
<p>PS: No idea how to implement this…</p>
<p>Subscribe to the <a href="atom.xml">Atom feed</a></p>
<p>to get notified about futre compiler-related articles.</p>
</div>
<script>
function gotoVariant(variant) {
window.location.href = window.location.href.replace(/\.\w+.html/g, variant);
}
window.addEventListener('beforeprint', (event) => {
gotoVariant('.min.pdf');
});
</script>
<script src="coffee.js" async>
</script>
</body>
</html>